August 28, 2008

Class-Action Lawsuit Filed against Nursing Home Company

The father of a woman who died as a result of nursing home negligence has filed a lawsuit against Milwaukee-based Extendicare Homes, Inc, claiming that the company cheated thousands of residents out of promised care. The lawsuit seeks class-action status for all residents at Extendicare nursing homes in the state of Washington since 2004.

The man's daughter, a woman aged 49, was in one of the company's homes recovering from a stroke. After less than 24 hours in the hospital, she died when her tracheal tube clogged with mucus, causing oxygen starvation and brain death. The suit says she had been left alone for hours, and was insufficiently monitored.

The potential class action suit alleges that Extendicare was essentially running a fraudulent operation, promising care that it had no intention of providing. The 15 homes were cited for a total of 278 deficiencies in care in 2007, an average of almost 19 per home.

The lawsuit is an attempt to strike at the heart of corporatized elder care. As long as nursing home operators can count their profits from all residents, and their losses only from individuals whose families are able to successfully prove deficient care, it is possible for them to grind out their profit using an inhuman calculus of acceptable loss, but if lawsuits force companies to pay for the deficient care they provide to all residents, such an equation becomes impossible.

If you have lost a loved one as a result of deficient nursing home care, contact an experienced nursing home lawyer at Pomerantz, Perlbgerger, and Lewis, LLP today for a free initial consultation.

Bookmark and Share

August 26, 2008

Tort Reform Reality: Less Access to Due Process

It is a definite eye-opener for people who believe that tort reform will not deny average citizens access to courts: a licensed physician whose lawsuit was dismissed because he didn't file a "certificate of merit" signed by a licensed physician.

The lawsuit was filed in West Virginia, where it fell under the authority of the state's 2003 law, the Medical and Professional Liability Act (MPLA), and it involved one doctor, a family physician, who went to another doctor, a urologist, for treatment of kidney stones. The lawsuit alleges that the treating doctor's errors led the doctor being treated to develop Peyronie's Disease and renal failure. So the family physician sued the urologist for medical malpractice as well as slander, fraud, and battery.

The problem is not only that the MPLA disqualifies a physician from making judgments about what constitutes a meritorious lawsuit. While one might argue that a general practitioner is not qualified to make pronouncements relevant to a specialized field of medicine, I would contend that a GPs assertion should be sufficient to at least get a lawsuit into court, where the final merit of the suit would be evaluated. Of course, a physician might be disallowed from signing his own certificate of merit, but still be allowed to file a certificate signed by another GP.

The second problem with the MPLA becomes clear when you see that the family physician went to a dozen urologists to get a certificate of merit, and only two of them were willing to sign the certificate, and they each wanted $40,000 to perform the service. This level of pre-trial payment is completely out of the reach of many people attempting to file a lawsuit. And can we assume that the doctor's difficulty was because his suit really did lack merit, and only unscrupulous doctors would sign for cash? There are many reasons why urologists might have been reluctant to sign the certificate, including professional ties to the doctor in question, but if unscrupulous doctors will sign any certificate for money, the MPLA only serves to deny access for people without money, the very people most in need when they suffer as a result of a medical malpractice injury.

Of course, the family physician's real mistake was trying to file the lawsuit without an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. It was not until his first suit was dismissed that he decided to engage a lawyer.

Don't make that mistake. If you are trying to file a medical malpractice lawsuit, you need a medical malpractice lawyer. Contact Pomerantz, Perlberger, and Lewis, LLP today for a free initial consultation.

Bookmark and Share